TrueCostHousingSEE THE COST BEFORE YOU COMMIT

Scenario comparison tool

Compare the paths. Do not confuse a scenario with a forecast.


Show your rent, buy, sale, and investment assumptions side by side over the number of years you expect to stay. Change any figure to see what actually drives the result.

Time and purchase

A scenario horizon, not a recommendation.
Contract or target price.
Percent of price.
Use your Cash to Close plan.

Loan and annual ownership

Fixed-rate scenario.
Years.
User-entered planning estimate.
Use a real quote when available.
Enter zero if none.
Annual percent of price; planning only.

Rent, sale, and growth assumptions

Comparable rent you would otherwise pay.
Your scenario, not a prediction.
Your scenario, not a prediction.
Percent of future sale price.
Your scenario; not investment advice.
Buy net cost after estimated saleRent net cost after assumed investment return
YearBuy net costRent net costEstimated buyer equityEstimated home value

Who this comparison is for

Use this when you are choosing between two paths for the same stretch of years — staying a renter or buying a specific home — not when you are deciding whether a particular home is priced fairly. It is most useful once you have a real rent figure to compare, a purchase price you are actually considering, and a rough idea of how long you expect to stay, since the holding period changes the math more than almost any other input.

What each input means

How the comparison works

For buying, the tool adds principal and interest, property tax, insurance, HOA, maintenance reserve, and up-front buying costs. At the end of each year, it subtracts estimated net sale proceeds after the remaining loan balance and the selling-cost percentage you entered.

For renting, it adds rent growing at your chosen annual rate. It then subtracts the assumed return on the cash you did not put into the purchase: the down payment and up-front buying costs.

What this does not know

A worked example, using the figures already loaded above

With every default value on this page left unchanged — a $400,000 home, 15% down, a 6.5% rate, $2,200 rent growing 3% a year, and a 7-year horizon — the estimated home value after 7 years is about $491,950, against a remaining loan near $307,415, for roughly $184,500 of buyer equity before selling costs. The model’s buyer net cost at year 7 comes to about $115,000, versus an estimated $174,200 for the renter, a gap of roughly $59,000 in this scenario. Because the assumed 3% annual appreciation on the full home price outpaces the 7% one-time selling cost fairly quickly here, this particular set of assumptions shows buying ahead for every year of the horizon, not just year 7 — that is a property of these specific numbers, not a rule. Change the appreciation, rent growth, or investment-return assumption and the crossover point moves or disappears.

How to interpret the result

Read the headline difference together with the break-even year and the chart, not by itself. A small dollar difference at a short horizon is less decisive than the same difference at year 15, because more of the buy path’s advantage in this model comes from years of compounding appreciation and equity paydown. If the two lines in the chart stay close for most of the horizon, the decision is more sensitive to your assumptions than the single headline number suggests — try raising rent growth, lowering appreciation, or raising the investment-return rate to see how much the answer moves.

Common mistakes

Related guides and calculators

Sources and safe next steps

The fixed-rate loan payment and remaining-balance calculations use standard amortization mathematics. No local costs are automatically estimated. Use your Cash to Close plan, lender documents, insurer quote, HOA documents, and actual comparable rent to replace the example inputs. See the site methodology and limitations.